Static and Dynamic Routing
Routing
- Send IP packets across the network
- Forwarding decisions are based on destination IP address
- Each router only knows the next step
- The packet asks for directions every hop along the way
- The list of directions is held in a routing table
Routing
- Different topologies use different data link protocols
- Ethernet, HDLC, etc.
- Each router rewrites the frame to add its own data-link header
- The IP packet remains intact
Static routing
- Administratively define the routes - You're in control
- Advantages
- Easy to configure and manage on smaller networks
- No overhead from routing protocols (CPU, memory, bandwidth)
- Easy to configure on sub networks (only one way out)
- More secure - no routing protocols to analyze
- Disadvantages
- Difficult to administer on larger networks
- No automatic method to prevent routing loops
- If there's a network change, you have to manually update the routes
- No automatic rerouting if an outage occurs
Dynamic routing
- Routers send routes to other routers
- Routing tables are updated in (almost) real-time
- Advantages
- No manual route calculations or management
- New routes are populated automatically
- Very scalable
- Disadvantages
- Some router overhead required
- Requires some initial configuration to work properly
Default route
- A route when no other route matches
- The "gateway of last resort"
- A remote site may have only one route
- Go that way -> rest of the world
- Can dramatically simplify the routing process
- Works in conjunction with all other routing methods
Comments
Post a Comment